栏目

台红毛杜鹃Rhododendron rubropilosum Hayata

台红毛杜鹃Rhododendron rubropilosum Hayata

别名:红毛杜鹃;

科名:杜鹃花科 Ericaceae

属名:杜鹃属 Rhododendron

《中国植物志》第57(2)卷379页
  280. 台红毛杜鹃(中国植物学会杂志)红毛杜鹃(台湾植物志)图版123:1-5
  Rhododendron rubropilosum Hayata in Journ. Coll. Sci. Tokyo 30 (1): 173. 1911; Kanehira, dorm. Trees, 326. f. 11. 1917; Komatsu in Tokyo Bot. Mag. 32: 16. 191; Wils. in Wils. et Rehd., Monog. Azal. 52. 1921 et in Journ. Arn. Arb. 6: 182. 1925; Rehd. in Stevenson, Spec. Rhodod. 99. 1930; Fang in Journ. Bot. Soc. China 2(2):609. 1935;台湾植物志4: 35-36. 1978.——R. caryophyllum Hayata, Icon. Pl. Form. 3: 130. pl. 23. 1913; Kanehira, in ibid. 318. 1917.——R. randaiense Hayata, in ibid. 5: Suppl. 43. 1917.
  灌木,高达3米;分枝繁密,幼枝细长,密被红褐色扁平糙伏毛;老枝淡黄灰褐色,无毛。叶革质,集生枝顶,长圆披针形或卵状披针形,长1.5-4.5厘米,宽0.5-1.9厘米,先端锐尖,具短尖头,基部楔形,边缘全缘,微反卷,上面深绿色,下面淡绿色,幼时两面密被淡黄棕色绢状扁平糙伏毛,成长后上面被棕褐色或灰白色糙伏毛,毛基圆形,凸起,下面密被淡黄棕色或红褐色扁平糙伏毛,杂以白色微柔毛,中脉和侧脉在上面凹陷,下面凸出;叶柄长3-6毫米,被扁平糙伏毛。花芽卵球形,鳞片卵形,先端锐尖,外面沿中部被锈红色糙伏毛,内面近顶部被毛。伞形花序顶生,具花2-4朵;花梗长6毫米,被淡黄棕色绢状糙伏毛;花萼5裂,裂片长圆形,长1.5-4毫米,被淡黄棕色绢状糙伏毛;花冠粉红色,阔漏斗形,长1.7厘米,直径达2.5厘米,裂片5,开展,长圆形,长7毫米,内面具粉红色斑点,花冠管长1厘米;雄蕊7-10,不等长,部分伸出花冠外,花丝线形,近基部被疏柔毛;子房卵球形,长3毫米,干后黑褐色,密被淡黄棕色糙伏毛,花柱比雄蕊长,长约2厘米,近基部被棕褐色扁平糙伏毛。蒴果圆锥状卵球形,长5-7毫米,直径4毫米,密被棕褐色糙伏毛。花期7月,果期8-10月。
  特产于我国台湾中部。常生于海拔1 000-3 300米的山地林中。欧美也有栽培。模式标本采自台湾中部山区。
  本种与毛果杜鹃R. seniavinii Maxim. 相似,但不同在于后者的花冠管外面被疏柔毛;雄蕊5,花丝基部扁平,无毛,易于区别。
形态特征:灌木,高达3米;分枝繁密,幼枝细长,密被红褐色扁平糙伏毛;老枝淡黄灰褐色, 无毛。叶革质,集生枝顶,长圆披针形或卵状披针形,长1.5—4.5厘米,宽0.5—1.9厘 米,先端锐尖,具短尖头,墓部楔形,边缘全缘,微反卷,上面深绿色,下面淡绿色,幼 时两面密被淡黄棕色绢状扁平糙伏毛,成长后上面被棕褐色或灰白色糙伏毛,毛基圆形, 凸起,下面密被淡黄棕色或红褐色扁平糙伏毛,杂以白色微柔毛, 中脉和侧脉在上面凹 陷,下面凸出;叶柄长3—6毫米.被扁平糙伏毛。花芽卵球形,鳞片卵形,先端锐尖, 外面沿中部被锈红色糙伏毛,内面近顶部被毛。伞形花序顶生,具花2—4朵;花梗长6 毫米,被淡黄棕色绢状糙伏毛;花萼5裂,裂片长圆形,长1.5—4毫米,被淡黄棕色绢 状糙伏毛;花冠粉红色,阔漏斗形,长1.7厘米,直径达2.5厘米,裂片5,开展,长圆 形,长7毫米, 内面具粉红色斑点,花冠管长1厘米;雄蕊7—10,不等长,部分伸出花冠外,花丝线形,近基部被疏柔毛;子房卵球形,长3毫米,干后黑褐色,密被淡黄棕色糙伏毛,花柱比雄蕊长,长约2厘米,近基部被棕褐色扁平糙伏毛。蒴果圆锥状卵球形,长5—7毫米,直径4毫米,密被棕褐色糙伏毛。 花期7月,果期8—10月。
产地分布:特产于我国台湾中部。常生于海拔1000--3300米的山地林中。欧美也有栽培。模式标本采自台湾中部山区。
本种提示:本种与毛果杜鹃R.Seniavinii Maxim.相似,但不同在于后者的花冠管外面被疏柔 毛;雄蕊5,花丝基部扁平,无毛,易于区别。
参考文献:Rhododendron rubropilosum Hayata in Journ、Coll.Sci.Tokyo 30(1):173.1911; Kanehira, Form. Trees, 326.F.11. 1917;Komatsu in Tokyo Bot. Mag. 32:16. 1918;Wils.In Wils.Et Rehd, Monog. Azal. 52. 1921 et in Journ. Am. Arb. 6:182 1925;Rehd. In Stevenson, Spec. Rhodod. 99, 1930;Fang in Journ.Bot. Soc.China 2(1):609.1935;台湾植物志4:35-36.1978.——R.Caryophyllum Hayata。 Icon.P1,Form .3:130.pl.23.1913:Kanehira.In ibid.318.1917.——R.Randaiense Hayata,in ibid.5:Suppl,43.1917.

《Flora of China》 Vol. 14 (2005)
Rhododendron rubropilosum  Hayata
台红毛杜鹃   tai hong mao du juan
Shrubs, up to 3 m tall; young shoots slender, densely coarsely red-brown strigose, hairs flat. Leaves all similar. Petiole 2–6 mm, indumentum as for shoots; leaf blade oblong-lanceolate, 1.5–4.5 × 0.5–1.9 cm; base cuneate; margin entire and slightly revolute; apex acute and mucronate; both surfaces densely yellowish brown silky strigose when young. Inflorescence 2–4-flowered. Pedicel ca. 0.6 cm, coarsely yellowish brown silky strigose; calyx lobes oblong, 1.5–4 mm, coarsely yellowish brown silky strigose; corolla broadly funnelform, pink, with darker pink flecks within, to 2.5 cm wide; tube ca. 10 mm; lobes spreading, oblong, ca. 1.7 × 0.7 cm; stamens 7 or 10, unequal, some longer than corolla, filaments linear, sparsely pubescent at base; ovary ovoid, densely coarsely yellowish brown strigose; style ca. 2 cm, longer than stamens, hairy near base. Capsules conical-ovoid, 5–7 × ca. 4 mm, densely coarsely brown strigose. Fl. Jul, fr. Aug–Oct.
Mountain forests; 1000–3300 m. C Taiwan.
Rhododendron rubropilosum var. grandiflorum T. Yamazaki (Revis. Gen. Rhododendron Japan, Taiwan, Korea & Sakhalin, 36. 1996) is said to differ from var. rubropilosum in having the leaf blade 3–5 cm, corolla 3–3.5 cm wide, and stamens 5 or 6. The type is a cultivated specimen raised from material collected in Nantou County, Taiwan. The number of stamens suggests an affinity with R. breviperulatum, rather than with R. rubropilosum. Furthermore, it is not known whether any plants in the wild possess these larger flowers and leaves. Therefore, the status and affinities of var. grandiflorum remain uncertain.

TOP